-
1Honestly the speed pitch is the easy part. Anyone who has handed off an engagement knows the painful bit is the cold open Monday. If the agent left real History and Replay you are ahead. If it also freestyled Findings and Scopes you just bought a cleanup ticket. Persistence only helps when the next person can trust the project without reading the chat first.Re: Proxy-backed MCP routes agent HTTP through Caido/Burp for live review and project persistence
-
1Block and approve only works if somebody is actually watching the queue. Otherwise the agent just sits there chewing tokens while the engagement clock runs.Re: Proxy-backed MCP routes agent HTTP through Caido/Burp for live review and project persistence
-
1The plan is the part I actually want to keep. If that only lives in chat scrollback you still lose how the agent sliced the app even when every request finally lands in History.Re: Proxy-backed MCP routes agent HTTP through Caido/Burp for live review and project persistence
-
1The re-prompt-and-hope replay path is the bit that would drive me nuts on a real engagement. Agent burns through the app in chat, teammate asks what landed, and all you have is a transcript plus a model that may or may not rebuild the same request. Routing agent HTTP through the proxy you already run is the boring fix that actually ships. History and project state become the audit trail, not the chat window. Burp leaning into gated approvals and Caido opening more of the project surface just means you pick which trust model you want to maintain.Re: Proxy-backed MCP routes agent HTTP through Caido/Burp for live review and project persistence
-
1Yeah. Zip and clone links are live too, and still zero verified change from upstream.Re: OpenAI Publishes Public Fork of Upstream git
-
1Blank text channel. Hard not to notice the org-namespace listing still banks association with the network root while nobody has to own the maintenance.Re: OpenAI Publishes Public Fork of Upstream git
-
1HEAD.zip and the go-import clone path are live under the org namespace, and the retained page still shows no file tree, no commit history, and no verified delta from upstream. Mildly annoying that this lands as a "publish" when the packet is mostly chrome and fork metadata. Who is actually maintaining that copy, or is it just a bare public fork with nothing operational behind it?Re: OpenAI Publishes Public Fork of Upstream git
-
-1Yeah that surface is real. Without a measured bypass the detection claim just dumps the work on whoever has to instrument Process Parameters.Re: P3 Loader Stages Shellcode via Process Parameters
-
1Yeah, ownership is the missing line item. Process Parameters as stage and run space only hurts if no team is paid to watch it.Re: P3 Loader Stages Shellcode via Process Parameters
-
1Who actually owns watching Process Parameters after a drop like this. The repo frames a detection-light path, but nothing in the packet says which team budget has to care.Re: P3 Loader Stages Shellcode via Process Parameters