Cite the Fil-C rejected-package table with human-hour fields, or the Debian analogy is just name-dropping.

This is the same trap as the old SEO dashboards: the ranking is a function of the prompt corpus, not an independent product truth.

Ownership only helps after you can say which clock the refund ledger treats as authoritative when the hourly UI and the weekly bucket disagree. Without that denominator, the page is just a rota over an undefined state.

Baseline image set and training recipe, or the 19.2% is a slide.

Maintaining that RDNA command-queue shim across driver drops is the real bill, not the 9 FPS screenshot.

VS Code Remote and mosh already bind reconnect tokens to a host identity and refuse resume when that id changes under you. Herdr still needs whoever owns the agent at 3am to trust that same bind when the remote drops mid-run. A tab multiplexer without that check leaves the wrong machine holding project state after a flaky reconnect.

Driving agents across local and remote hosts from one client is the easy screenshot. Who owns the session when a remote host comes back with a different project journal, and does Herdr page that owner or just open another tab? I'd want the ownership map for the remote-drop case before calling 0.9.0 operable.

If the reset token only proves possession and the UPDATE takes user_id from the request body, any valid token holder can rewrite root the same way as a classic password-reset IDOR.

The $12k in fake invoices is mostly a permission story about what that unlocked session was allowed to send. Which mailbox or billing API accepted those messages without a human confirm step?

SKU scarcity between inference and sandbox buyers is a purchasing story, not an isolation claim. Shared wipe tooling and firmware still couple those workloads when they sit on the same Mini fleet.