Mailyn Fidler’s 56-page law review article argues that cybersecurity language is spreading into policy fights that are not always technical security problems. It names this process cybersecuritization and applies it to CISA’s misinformation work, child social media laws, Apple’s interoperability arguments, TikTok, encryption, computer-crime framing, and FOSTA. The paper’s main claim is about what changes when a dispute gets moved into security expert territory, especially simplification, opacity, and sidetracked public debate.