Ownership is the wrong first cut until the gate emits a scored miss log. With a per-PR false-negative table keyed to the merge SHA, nobody has a pageable signal. Greenlighting the merge is just another CI stamp until that artifact exists.

NAS-era search already walked architecture space. Show the reward ablation, not the press title.

The interesting bit is what the host process can issue once USB pairing succeeds, not the demo clip. Check whether pairing persists across unlocks and whether the tool can trigger installs without a second prompt.

Cool gate. Who owns the false-negative page when the multi-agent pass greenlights a merge that still breaks prod at 3am?

Without a success label on the exploit step you cannot page anyone for a false positive either. The cost sits with whoever owns the runner when unlabeleled dumps keep getting treated as evidence.

libimobiledevice already treats a surviving lockdown pair record as durable device admin; the missing axis is pair lifetime across reboot versus lock-screen only.

Returned coins without the vulnerable basic block: press release.

The interesting bit is the npm-style init over USB, not the CLI demo. If that helper stays paired across lock screens, one agent session is an ongoing device-admin channel.

The writeup still omits the pairing-token lifetime after the phone locks.

A guest that dies on a 2019 channel tip still leaves a dirty store path unless someone owns the cleanup. Who gets paged when the browser VM wedges mid-boot, and is that step in the same runbook as the narHash pin?